Almost a year ago now, Wizards of the Coast launched their slate of updated Core Rulebooks for D&D – then branded “OneD&D,” but mostly referred to as D&D 2024 or 5.5e by the community at large. After running the game using these books since December, I thought it’d be a good time to sit down with this edition’s update and consider what it’s done for this hobby and game during its tenure, and perhaps speculate on what it might mean for its future.
A Refresher on My Credentials
I’ve been running D&D or another system for more than half my life at this point with few breaks or stoppages. Since late 2020, I’ve run a weekly game through discord and talespire. With my table, we’ve run a homebrew game from level one to twenty, tried pathfinder 2e, ran a “season” of Blades in the Dark, and we’ve been working our way through Tyranny of Dragons for over a year now with a few roster changes along the way.
I’ve also been playing as a fighter in a game run by another friend once a month for a year now with a rather large party, made of mutual friends from our guild on World of Warcraft.
Lastly, I’ve also been running a biweekly/once-a-month game with my brothers and my mom (who practically never played D&D before) since January.
I play D&D a lot.
The New Player Experience
Much like 5e before it, I think 5.5 still serves as an excellent entry point into this hobby. While the rules hide a secret complexity beneath the hood, they rarely layer on themselves so precariously that it becomes hard to understand. Since the launch of 5.5, I’ve seen a total of about 9 people play D&D for the first time, and each of them is becoming more and more proficient with the rules each session.
This system has always had the benefit of its ability to just get out of the way when it needs to. It’s got a looseness to its rules that leave it feeling more malleable than something more nailed down, like Pathfinder 2e. Even leaning into something that isn’t intended by the rules for the sake of the fun of your players rarely backfires too terribly; as DMs, we have a wide arsenal of knobs and dials we can twist to keep the game balanced and fun for the whole table.
As an example, in the game with my warcraft guildmates, we’re running the rules on the monk’s ability to grapple and how effective it is in a way that’s a bit more powerful than it would be with the exact language of the rules. But, it’s been a blast for the monk and everyone else, and the DM will always have the opportunity to run monsters that can break grapples more efficiently – or perhaps incorporeal foes that can’t be grappled to begin with, should he need that to be relaxed for an encounter.
And, for returning players, the game feels near-frictionless to those of us who spent any amount of time playing 5e. It is, after all, almost the same system.
Character Options and Power Scaling
Out of the whole system, I think this is where the bulk of the adjustments lie, and they run in both directions. Outliers in balance from the original 5e launch have been reined in; many classes and abilities that were falling behind have been brought forward. This hasn’t been perfect, obviously. Some changes still fall way off the mark, such as the Ranger’s level 19 capstone buffing Hunter’s Mark’s damage dice, but I think most have been good.
Smite, for example, took a nerf, requiring a bonus action to cast. This reduced the ability of a paladin PC to “nova” – to spend their resources at an extremely liberal rate to burst through the enemies faced in an encounter. Sharpshooter and Great Weapon Master both lost their ability to take a reduction on your roll-to-hit in exchange for damage, but when something provides that much additional throughput, it stops being optional. Taking that direct power away from those feats brought them more level with other options, and both still provide valuable bonuses to appropriate characters.
Healing spells have taken a large swath of buffs; Cure Wounds and Healing Word both roll twice as many dice when cast. Aura of Vitality no longer requires your bonus action each turn to activate its healing. Where these spells often felt like a misused action in 5e, in 5.5, they can truly make the difference in whether or not a PC falls in combat before reaching 0 hit points.
Weapon Masteries on the other hand, have an odd level of impact. Some, like Vex and Nick, adjust one’s playstyle with enough impact that they’re easy to remember and use each turn. Others, like Slow, rarely feel like they’re meaningful with how sticky combat in 5.5e continues to be. (The fighter I’ve been playing has been using a longbow almost exclusively, and I’ve never remembered to call out Slow.) Then, options like Push and Topple are very potent when compared to the other mastery options. The table’s got some wobble, is all I mean to say – not that it isn’t good for martials to have these abilities.
Nerfed Spells
As part of the redesign, a couple of spells took a hit. Some are a bit odd – changing Inflict Wounds to a Constitution saving throw instead of a hit roll to eliminate its ability to critically strike while also reducing its damage by 1d10 seems heavy handed to me. This was a staple spell for our cleric in the game I ran to level 20, and it never felt like the spell that made him too potent in any battle. If any spell claimed that title, it’d have been Spirit Guardians, which itself took a mixed adjustment. It now can effect enemies whenever they enter the area, meaning you can use it like we might in Baldur’s Gate 3 and run over enemies like a lawnmower on our own turns; however, it also only affects enemies that remain in the effect at the end of their turn rather than the start, where before it might eliminate an affected target before it could act.
Counterspell also had a major adjustment that changed the texture of the whole spell, but I think it’s for the better. We’re up to level 9 in my Tyranny of Dragons campaign, and at a similar level in the homebrew game prior, Counterspell got a lot more use. Now, it’s much less automatic; both as an option, and also in effect. Now that this spell always involves a die roll, I feel it’s better on both sides of the screen. Neither your players nor your monsters will have their entire turn upended by a single reaction; instead, it’s always down to the dice.
Monster Adjustments
I remember in the run-up to 5.5, back when we were on the edge of the horizon getting Mordenkainen’s Monsters of the Multiverse, people were worried that many monsters were going to be doing Force damage with their physical attacks; that many spells had been replaced by “spell-like abilities” that would not be valid Counterspell or Dispel Magic targets. So far, I haven’t used anything in my games or faced anything in my friend’s game that did Force damage when we expected Bludgeoning, Piercing, or Slashing.
I have, however, used some of the new spell caster stat blocks, and their multiattack spell blasts are pretty wild. I appreciate the goal here – just writing a list of spells the DM needs to familiarize themselves with isn’t a particularly elegant way to write a stat block; however, these not-spells often have a very high damage output, surpassing even that of Fireball when that spell is intentionally over-tuned. The only drawback there is that you’re only hitting one creature at a time, but then, if you’re playing with experienced Dungeons and Dragons PCs, they’re already spreading out to dodge the fireball they’re expecting from an enemy wizard.
And, the “Arcane Burst” or similar abilities allow the wizards to use their bonus actions for Misty Step and get around the one-spell-per-turn-rule while also avoiding attacks of opportunity. (Of course, Arcane Burst can also just be used as a melee attack, so they don’t really even need to move when they use it.)
On the whole, I think monsters have changed for the better. Player Characters got a bump in power; monsters received the same. That allows the choices made in encounters to be more interesting and dynamic, and that’s always a good trend for the design of D&D.
The Opportunity Cost
Despite being an overall positive adjustment to the game, I can’t help but feel a sense of … uncertainty when it comes to 5.5. Over its ten years on the market, 5e swelled D&D’s popularity to never-before-imagined heights from a confluence of events no one could’ve predicted. An easy to run and play ruleset met the rise of actual-play podcasts and unscripted shows using TTRPGs as their engine. Critical Role, Dimension 20, NADDPOD, The Adventure Zone and so many more broadened the appeal of D&D to a whole new audience; one that continues to expand.
With all that in mind, it’s easy to see why Wizards would choose to stick close to 5e and only make tweaks to their rules, rather than scrap it all in favor of something new. They truly captured lightning in a bottle in 2014, but now, in 2025, I’m not one to bet on them managing that again.
That game is the same, ultimately, and it feels like it’s losing steam. Right now, we have Daggerheart as the new kid on the block, and it’s getting a lot of buzz – including Crawford and Perkins joining Darrington Press just a few weeks ago. Couple that with WOTC’s seeming inability to make good decisions, and it’s easy to see why people are happy to look for something new. Hell, I’ve been running this game forever and I’m extremely comfortable with it. I’ve got stat blocks lodged into my brain; I don’t even use notes at all for some of the sessions I run for my family. And yet, despite that familiarity, of the three or four campaign ideas I have rattling around in my head to run after Tyranny of Dragons, only one feels like it would fit best with D&D. Everything else might be better served by another system.
Personally, I believe launching a fresh 6th edition would’ve been the better choice, and an almost surefire win for WOTC. If it’d been good, it’d have recaptured the audience and held them in. If it wasn’t, people would’ve kept playing 5e, just like they did when they didn’t like 4th edition as much as 3.5, and we’d be in more-or-less the same spot as we are now. Instead, WOTC doubled down on 5e after it has already been showing its age, and I’d hesitate to say they’ll have the same level of buy-in for their next edition. If they even get one.
And it’d be sad to see it go – I’ve loved D&D since the first moment I played it. But, as I said when we hit the OGL drama in 2023, this hobby is bigger than D&D. It’s grown beyond it, despite how much it still dominates as the most popular game within it.
As always, thank you for reading. Good luck out there, heroes.
Ben Stovall Blog 